Global growth – what should we worry about?
Hope is an expensive commodity. It is better to be prepared.
Cautious optimism from the top down
The IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook1 is cautiously optimistic on the prospects for a gradual global economic growth recovery, following last year’s 2.9% growth rate with a 3.3% in 2020 and 3.4% in 2021. The principal trigger for the downgrade of these forecasts from prior editions is India, who is now into the third year of economic slowdown.
The guarded optimism for the next two years is founded on the expectation that a group of emerging economies return to their longer-term average growth rates, including India, but also counting Brazil, Mexico, Russia and Turkey. The widespread reductions in interest rates that we have seen in 2019 are feeding through now, underpinning much of this optimism.
For investors, this is a relatively good backdrop for global investing and bodes well for returns in 2020, but there are two clearly recognised key risks to bear in mind, and some less generally accepted, but still significant factors, at least for specific regions of the world.
The risks – some recognised, others not so much
One recognised risk is trade deterioration, especially if the ‘tariff war’ between the US and China continues and spreads further to other countries. The table below demonstrates the extent of the global trade slowdown that took place in 2019. Of the world’s top traders, the US has the lowest trade intensity2, at 32%. The UK for example, has 62% trade intensity, while Korea’s is 76%. Hong Kong of course lives for trade, with a 371% trade intensity. A freeze or de-escalation in the trade war would be very positive for these countries.
2019: A Bad Year for the World's Trades Superpowers
Change in global merchandise trade volume Q1-Q3 2018 to Q1-Q3 2019 of world's top ten traders
Source: Statista and World Economic Forum
Meanwhile, looming on the horizon is a potentially very thorny trade negotiation between the US and Europe. The EU has quietly become the world’s most important regulatory body, which ostensibly does not sit well with the current White House. This leadership status is backed by the Union’s position as the biggest consumer market in the world but clearly is going to be a bone of contention for Washington DC.
The other key risk is the scenario whereby the technology sector value chain is further distorted by rising geopolitical tensions between the US and China. That would be very damaging to growth, to investment and to earnings in fairly short order. This is most evident today in technology, but it has ramifications for every supply chain in the global economy.
Companies spent decades designing and calibrating their supply chains to achieve the optimal combination of cost, quality, reliability and synchronisation. Corporate earnings have risen, and consumers have benefitted from these optimised logistics chains. We have now injected a new component, politics, which is tough to quantify and is by definition unstable.
A regionally very significant issue is the final shape of Brexit – it seems more likely now that a ‘hard’ Brexit is a possibility, given all the red lines being put out by both sides. The cost to the economies of the UK and the EU will be significant, but tough to define at this point, given the wide range of potential outcomes. What is clear is that over half the UK’s exports go to the EU and the UK is a highly trade dependent economy.
Finally, climate change is an overriding and still underappreciated global phenomenon that constitutes significant ongoing risk and demands robust policy response, which so far appears to be lacking. This is something that is important, and we at Martin Currie will be researching further in the coming weeks and months.
1 IMF World Economic Outlook, January 2020. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/01/20/weo-update-january2020
2 Martin Currie and national trade statistics as at 31 December 2019: Trade intensity is a measure of the importance of trade for a country’s economy. The calculation is Imports + Exports, divided by GDP. The numbers are sourced from Martin Currie’s proprietary Country Risk Framework, which feeds data from the relevant country’s trade statistics office.
This information is issued and approved by Martin Currie
Investment Management Limited (‘MCIM’). It does not
constitute investment advice.
Market and currency movements may cause the capital value
of shares, and the income from them, to fall as well as rise and
you may get back less than you invested.
The opinions contained in this document are those of the
named manager(s). They may not necessarily represent the
views of other Martin Currie managers, strategies or funds.
The information provided should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. It should not
be assumed that any of the security transactions discussed here were or will prove to be profitable.