China Growth – How bad is it?
Logically, an economy the size of China’s... cannot physically grow at double digit percentage rates indefinitely.
In my experience, GDP numbers rarely elicit dramatic headlines, reeking of urgency and desperation. But when China announced GDP growth of 6.2% for the second quarter, it seemed to me that anguish was in the air. ‘China’s economic growth slumps to lowest in 27 years as the trade war hits !’ they screamed. ‘China’s economic growth is at its slowest since 1992 !’ Twitter was full of despondency – and schadenfreude.
It’s the trade war, some cried. There is no doubt that the US tariffs on Chinese imports contributed to the slowdown in the rate of growth, but so did Beijing’s established policy of reducing the size of the country’s debt – the government has been focused on this since 2013, when ‘financial risk’ was cited as a top priority.
But there is another, less reported but no less valid reason: Logically, an economy the size of China’s ($25trn adjusted for differences in purchasing power) cannot physically grow at double digit percentage rates indefinitely. When I started investing in Emerging Markets in 1996, China’s economy (adjusted for purchasing power) was a similar size to Japan’s. Now it’s five times as big.
Using World Bank GDP (PPP) data4, look what happens if China grows at ‘only’ 6% from here:
Source: Signal, a newsletter of Eurasia Group/GZERO Media https://www.gzeromedia.com/subscribe/
This information is issued and approved by Martin Currie
Investment Management Limited (‘MCIM’). It does not
constitute investment advice.
Market and currency movements may cause the capital value
of shares, and the income from them, to fall as well as rise and
you may get back less than you invested.
The opinions contained in this document are those of the
named manager(s). They may not necessarily represent the
views of other Martin Currie managers, strategies or funds.
The information provided should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. It should not
be assumed that any of the security transactions discussed here were or will prove to be profitable.